U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio accused Cuba, Nicaragua, and Venezuela of creating a migration crisis, during a visit to Costa Rica. Rubio suggested that these regimes are threats to humanity and stressed their ineffective governance as a core issue. Cuban President Miguel Diaz-Canel defended his country, attributing migrant outflows to the U.S. embargo. Rubio’s tour continues into Guatemala, following meetings in Panama and El Salvador.
On Tuesday, U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio criticized the authoritarian governments of Cuba, Nicaragua, and Venezuela, labeling them as “enemies of humanity” responsible for the regional migration crisis. During his visit to Costa Rica, Rubio asserted that without these regimes, mass migration would not be occurring in the Americas, emphasizing that their ineffective systems were to blame for the crisis.
Focusing on Nicaragua, Rubio condemned President Daniel Ortega’s consolidation of power and the constitutional amendments that empower his regime further. He described the situation as a familial dynasty where attempts to oppose the ruling authority lead to severe repercussions, much like in Cuba and Venezuela, prompting countless Nicaraguans to flee their homeland.
Cuban President Miguel Diaz-Canel responded sharply to Rubio’s statements through a post on X, accusing U.S. politicians of shamelessness. He argued that the U.S. trade embargo has been a driving force behind the migration crisis, stating, “It is proven that the migration exodus in Cuba is proportional to the tightening of the blockade.”
Following his stay in Costa Rica, Rubio continued his tour in Guatemala and expressed gratitude towards El Salvador’s leader, Nayib Bukele, for his controversial offer to imprison U.S. criminals in a newly established mega-prison for gang members. Rubio noted Bukele’s readiness to accept deported gang members from other Latin American nations, including Venezuela.
The recent remarks by Secretary of State Marco Rubio highlight the increasing challenges faced by Central American nations stemming from authoritarian governance and economic instability. As migration continues to surge from Cuba, Nicaragua, and Venezuela, the ramifications are felt across the region, prompting interventions from U.S. officials. These dynamics are further complicated by existing policies, such as the U.S. embargo against Cuba, which have long-term effects on the socio-economic conditions of the island.
In summary, Marco Rubio’s denunciations of the Cuban, Nicaraguan, and Venezuelan governments reveal a political narrative linking these regimes to the ongoing migration crisis in the Americas. This rhetoric has sparked significant responses from regional leaders, notably from Cuba’s Diaz-Canel, who attributes the migration issue partly to U.S. sanctions. The broader context of authoritarian rule and its impact on migration policy remains a focal point in U.S.-Latin America relations.
Original Source: www.hindustantimes.com
