Israel and the United States have not commented on Hezbollah’s allegations of pressure on Lebanon to stop Iranian flights delivering cash. Lebanon’s suspension of Iranian airline landings complicates financial logistics for Hezbollah but does not completely prevent it. Experts suggest that Iran may resort to alternative methods for financing Hezbollah, although logistical challenges remain.
Recent allegations from Hezbollah suggest that Israel and the United States have pressured Lebanon to halt the arrival of Iranian airliners delivering funds to the militant group. Observers note that this silence reflects the low-profile strategies of both nations concerning regional security issues. Although Lebanon’s temporary suspension of Iranian flights complicates cash flows to Hezbollah, it does not completely preclude such activities.
The Lebanese government’s suspension, initiated on February 13, was justified as a security measure, first affecting Mahan Air, which resulted in stranded passengers. Lebanese officials initially indicated the ban would last five days, but it was later extended indefinitely. Prior to the ban, Israel’s military warned against Iran’s military use of commercial flights, asserting that it would employ available means to protect its security interests as Hezbollah seeks funding post-conflict.
Reports from Hezbollah leadership claim they were warned by the Lebanese government of potential Israeli military action against Beirut’s airport if Iranian flights were allowed. Additionally, Hezbollah affiliates have suggested that American influence and sanctions played a role in this flight suspension, indicating a connection to U.S. pressures placed on Lebanese authorities regarding Hezbollah’s operational freedom.
Through a series of private communications and public assertions, the U.S. seldom directly threatens Lebanon but clearly articulates its stance against Hezbollah’s influence in governance. Recent comments from U.S. officials reaffirmed their commitment to counteracting Hezbollah’s destabilizing effects without indicating new sanctions against Lebanon. The U.S. and Israeli responses align with their historical methods of engagement regarding regional threats.
Experts suggest that while Iran faces difficulties in using its aircraft to transport funds to Hezbollah, it may turn to alternative routes through Iraq and Turkey. However, these methods may require greater cooperation with the respective governments. The complexity of coordinating cash transfers across borders complicates Iranian attempts to support Hezbollah financially without drawing international scrutiny.
Moreover, Lebanon has been taking steps to strengthen airport security, aligning with measures to limit Hezbollah’s influence. While the recent crackdown only applies to Iranian flights, the inconsistency of enforcement highlights ongoing challenges for Lebanese authorities in effectively mitigating Hezbollah’s financing options.
In conclusion, the silence of Israel and the U.S. regarding Hezbollah’s claims points to their strategic approach to regional security, focusing on maintaining pressure without overt declarations. The suspension of Iranian flights complicates financing for Hezbollah but does not eliminate the potential for alternative channels. The Lebanese government’s security measures highlight inconsistencies and the ongoing challenge of controlling Iran’s support for Hezbollah amidst international sanctions.
Original Source: www.voanews.com
