On September 30, 2024, the UAE accused the Sudanese army of bombing its ambassador’s residence in Khartoum, prompting condemnations from Gulf nations and Egypt. Sudan denied the accusations, asserting its right to defend national security. Various states condemned the alleged attack, citing violations of international law and diplomatic protocols.
On September 30, 2024, a diplomat from the United Arab Emirates (UAE) reiterated serious accusations against the Sudanese army, alleging that they had bombed the residence of the UAE ambassador in Khartoum. This assertion triggered widespread condemnation from various Gulf states and Egypt. UAE State Minister Sheikh Shakhbut bin Nahyan firmly condemned the attack, stating, “Our country condemns in the strongest terms the blatant attack launched by the Sudanese armed forces,” and highlighted the UAE’s firm stance against the ongoing violence against civilians by factions involved in the conflict in Sudan. In response, Sudan’s foreign ministry and military spokesperson strongly rejected the allegations, claiming it is their prerogative to protect national sovereignty and security. The accusations sparked a series of reactions from regional authorities. The foreign ministry of Saudi Arabia characterized the alleged attacks as a breach of international law, while Jordan condemned the situation, labeling it “a serious violation of international law and an attack on the sanctity of diplomatic premises protected under the Vienna Convention.” Oman’s foreign ministry also expressed disapproval, denouncing the incidents as a “clear violation of diplomatic charters, norms, and immunities.” Bahrain offered a similar response, showcasing “strong denunciation” and expressing solidarity with the UAE. Furthermore, Jasem Mohamed Al-Budaiwi, Secretary-General of the Gulf Cooperation Council, condemned the alleged attacks as a “blatant attack.” Egypt’s foreign ministry conveyed its distress regarding the rising tensions in Sudan, underscoring that any targeting of diplomatic facilities contravenes international law and the stipulations of the 1961 Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations.
The ongoing conflict in Sudan has escalated, with multiple factions engaged in violence that threatens the stability of the region. The UAE’s accusation of the Sudanese army bombing its ambassador’s residence underscores the fragility of diplomatic relations in conflict zones. This incident illustrates the delicate balance of diplomacy amidst ongoing warfare, prompting reactions not only from the directly involved parties but also from surrounding nations concerned about potential violations of international conventions that protect diplomatic entities.
In conclusion, the accusation made by the UAE against the Sudanese army regarding the bombing of a diplomatic residence has resulted in a wave of condemnation from various regional powers. The responses from Gulf states and Egypt signify a collective assertion of international law and underscore the importance of protecting diplomatic missions. As the situation in Sudan continues to evolve, the need for adherence to international norms remains critical to maintaining stability in the region.
Original Source: sudantribune.com
