Donald Trump’s potential return to the presidency could cement Egypt’s advantageous position under President Sisi, allowing for increased military aid and favorable trade without the concern of human rights oversight. Sisi’s relationship with Trump is rooted in shared authoritarian ideals, suggesting a continuation of U.S. support for Egypt as a key ally in Middle Eastern geopolitics, especially regarding its mediation skills in conflict areas.
With Donald Trump potentially returning to the presidency, Egypt stands to gain significant advantages as President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi is likely to find favor once again in Washington. Trump’s previous administration was marked by a lack of engagement with Africa, focusing primarily on arms sales and trade deals while overlooking human rights issues. Egypt, which imported substantial weaponry during Trump’s term, anticipates a continuation of military aid and trade agreements devoid of criticism regarding its authoritarian practices. The relationship between Trump and Sisi is built on a mutual admiration for authoritarianism, positioning Egypt as a crucial U.S. ally, particularly due to its role in mediating conflicts in the Middle East, including the ongoing tensions between Israel and Hamas.
The dynamics of U.S.-Egypt relations have historically been influenced by the personalities in leadership roles, particularly that of the U.S. president. During Trump’s first administration, Egypt secured significant military support, allowing it to bolster its defense capabilities while largely escaping scrutiny for its human rights abuses. The upcoming potential re-ascendancy of Trump suggests that the already emboldened Sisi regime will likely feel further empowered, focusing on consolidating power and navigating regional conflicts under America’s tacit approval.
In summary, should Donald Trump return to power, Egypt is poised to enhance its international standing while largely evading criticism for its internal policies. This scenario illustrates a broader trend where geopolitical alliances are prioritized over human rights, revealing the complexities and contradictions in U.S. foreign policy in the context of authoritarian rulers. As Egypt solidifies its role in regional diplomacy, the implications for its governance and the well-being of its citizens remain uncertain.
Original Source: foreignpolicy.com