Sudan has rejected Chad’s denial of support for the Rapid Support Forces (RSF), citing various forms of evidence to support its allegations. In response, Chad’s government has dismissed these accusations, suggesting that Sudan is attempting to distract from its internal governance problems. The situation remains tense between the two nations as Sudan files a complaint against Chad for alleged complicity in serious human rights violations committed by the RSF during the ongoing conflict.
On November 9, 2024, Sudan’s Foreign Ministry publicly rejected claims by Chad that it provided no support to the Rapid Support Forces (RSF), a paramilitary group engaged in conflict with the Sudanese army. The ministry argued that there is substantial evidence, including satellite imagery and United Nations reports, indicating Chad’s facilitation of arms and fighters from the United Arab Emirates to bolster the RSF. Human rights organizations, such as the US State Department-funded Conflict Observatory, have corroborated these assertions, underscoring concerns regarding Chad’s role in the conflict. The Sudanese Foreign Ministry asserted in a statement, “Chad’s continued support for this terrorist militia — the Rapid Support Forces — needs no further explanation,” and emphasized that evidence of Chad’s involvement in the conflict is evident. Conversely, Chad’s Foreign Ministry, in a statement from Foreign Minister Ghulam Allah Abdel Rahman, denied such support, characterizing the allegations as an attempt by Sudan to distract from its governance issues. The Chadian Foreign Minister stated, “The misleading accusations by Sudanese authorities aim to divert attention from their responsibility for the deteriorating situation in their country.” In reaction to Chad’s rebuttal, Sudan dismissed it as weak and reiterated claims that Chad serves as the primary conduit for weaponry and mercenaries essential to the RSF. Additionally, Sudan has lodged a formal complaint with the African Commission on Human and Peoples’ Rights, accusing Chad of complicity in grave crimes committed by the RSF, including aggression, genocide, and sexual violence. The ongoing war between Sudan’s army and the RSF has exacerbated the humanitarian crisis and heightened regional instability.
The tensions between Sudan and Chad stem from the ongoing conflict involving the Rapid Support Forces (RSF), a paramilitary group that has been active in the armed struggle against the Sudanese army. The RSF has been implicated in severe human rights abuses, leading to accusations against Chad for allegedly supplying them with weaponry and mercenaries. This has drawn international attention as humanitarian crises escalate within Sudan and neighboring regions, highlighting the geopolitical complexities of the situation.
In summary, the exchange between Sudan and Chad reflects deepening tensions surrounding the support of the RSF. While Sudan emphasizes evidence linking Chad to the RSF’s activities, Chad maintains its innocence, framing Sudan’s statements as deflections from its internal challenges. This dispute is critical as it negatively impacts regional security and humanitarian conditions amidst an ongoing conflict that continues to claim lives and create instability in the area.
Original Source: sudantribune.com
