- Azruddin Mohamed rejects claims of Venezuelan ties and supports Guyana’s sovereignty.
- He plans legal action against the PPPC government for its social media campaign.
- Congressman Gimenez’s comments raised alarms about democratic threats in Guyana.
WIN Leader Azruddin Mohamed Defends Guyana’s Sovereignty
Azruddin Mohamed, the leader of the We Invest in Nationhood (WIN) party, took a firm stance on Guyana’s sovereignty amidst allegations from U.S. Congressman Carlos A. Gimenez regarding his ties to Venezuela. On June 30, 2025, Mohamed categorically rejected claims that he is a “puppet candidate” for Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro ahead of the upcoming general elections on September 1. “I am resolute: I refute Venezuela’s claim over the Essequibo. I have always supported and will continue to support Guyana’s sovereignty,” he asserted in a press statement released following the accusations.
Legal Action Against Government for Misrepresentation
In addition to his firm denial of any Venezuela connections, Mr. Mohamed threatened legal action against the incumbent People’s Progressive Party Civic (PPPC) government for hiring a U.S. lobbying firm, Continental Strategy LLC. The government is reportedly paying this firm US$50,000 per month to craft posts on social media, and Mohamed expressed his intention to investigate these dealings with his legal team. He stated, “I am contemplating both civil and criminal actions against the Government of Guyana for facilitating and financing these false accusations through a registered foreign agent.” Moreover, he indicated that he would also pursue diplomatic avenues in light of this situation, aiming to expose this misconduct on an international level.
Gimenez’s Remarks and Mohamed’s Safety Concerns
Congressman Gimenez’s earlier comments on social media indicated significant concern from U.S. lawmakers regarding perceived threats to democracy posed by figures like Mohamed. He emphasized the need for the Western Hemisphere to remain free from influences of communist dictatorships, specifically calling out Mohamed, who alongside his father, has faced U.S. sanctions for alleged financial improprieties. Mohamed, expressing deep frustration, claimed these accusations are part of a broader political vendetta orchestrated by the current administration. He warned that linking him to a hostile regime jeopardizes his safety and undermines his political ambitions, thus engaging in a strategy that demonizes dissenters instead of fostering dialogue.
In conclusion, Azruddin Mohamed has firmly opposed accusations of being connected to Venezuela while asserting his commitment to Guyana’s sovereignty. He is exploring legal options against the government for what he classes as a smear campaign. His public response highlights ongoing tensions in Guyana’s political landscape, raising concerns about the misuse of power in the pursuit of political gains.
