Hezbollah’s lawmaker Hasan Fadlallah announced the group’s openness to dialogue on Lebanon’s national defense strategy. This shift signals potential discussions regarding its military arsenal, with President Aoun noting Hezbollah’s flexibility on disarmament issues. Both emphasize the importance of resolving these matters through communication, particularly in light of past violence and current tensions with Israel.
In recent developments, senior Hezbollah lawmaker Hasan Fadlallah announced that the group is willing to engage in discussions regarding Lebanon’s national defense strategy. This marks a potential shift in Hezbollah’s stance towards addressing its arsenal that operates outside the control of the state. Fadlallah stated that Hezbollah is in continuous communication with Lebanese President Joseph Aoun on the matter.
Fadlallah emphasized, “Hezbollah’s position is unified regarding the handling of weapons and the defense strategy. Today’s priority is halting aggression and liberating our territory. We are ready for any dialogue on the national strategy.” He expressed readiness for discussions once the President finalizes the framework for these talks.
President Aoun supported these claims, indicating that Hezbollah displayed “great flexibility” concerning disarmament. He shared these views with members of parliament, as reported by MP Sajih Attieh, highlighting Hezbollah’s willingness to cooperate regarding its weapons within a specified timeline.
Aoun reiterated the importance of resolving issues through dialogue, stating that Hezbollah is a legitimate part of the Lebanese political landscape. He maintained a firm policy stance, emphasizing that “there is no place for weapons or armed groups outside the framework of the state.”
The dialogue surrounding Hezbollah’s disarmament has gained urgency following the 2024 Israeli offensive, which resulted in significant casualties. After a ceasefire in November 2024, Lebanese authorities vowed to integrate all armed groups under the national army’s command. Notably, Hezbollah remains unique in retaining its weapons after the 1989 Taif Agreement that concluded Lebanon’s prolonged civil war.
Initially supported by Iran during the 1980s as a resistance movement against Israeli occupation, Hezbollah has transformed into a significant political and military actor in Lebanon. It holds parliamentary seats and maintains a militia that is often perceived as being more formidable than the Lebanese army.
Historical tensions between Hezbollah and Israel have persisted for decades, notably escalating during the 2006 Lebanon War. Recent hostilities flared again in 2024, culminating in a severe Israeli offensive in southern Lebanon, which was then followed by a ceasefire.
The possibility for dialogue regarding national defense represents a critical juncture, potentially addressing long-standing issues surrounding Hezbollah’s military presence and the future of Lebanon’s stability.
In summary, Hezbollah’s willingness to engage in discussions on Lebanon’s national defense suggests a significant shift towards addressing the management of its weaponry and military presence. Both Hezbollah and President Aoun express openness to dialogue as a means to resolve the complex issues surrounding national security and sovereignty. Given the ongoing tensions with Israel and the recent violent conflicts, the outcome of these discussions will be crucial for Lebanon’s political landscape and regional stability.
Original Source: efe.com
