Protests called by Zimbabwean war veteran Blessed Geza received mixed reactions, with many citizens staying away from work, especially in Harare. While Geza praised this response as a rejection of corruption, ZANU-PF spokesperson contested its effectiveness, indicating differing perceptions on political mobilization.
In response to the stay-away initiative led by Zimbabwean war veteran Blessed Geza, there was a notable, albeit mixed, reaction across the nation. Observations indicated that on Monday, numerous Zimbabweans, particularly in major cities, refrained from attending work despite the absence of large-scale public protests.
The atmosphere in Harare, the capital, was particularly subdued, with most businesses and educational institutions remaining closed. Geza expressed gratitude toward the citizens for their participation, stating, “I want to thank you, Zimbabweans, for heeding our call to take action. The streets were empty. This is encouraging; we have sent a clear message that you want Emmerson and his corrupt cabal to go.”
Contrarily, ZANU-PF spokesperson Christopher Mutsvangwa dismissed the effectiveness of the protest, remarking, “The people of Zimbabwe showed their political mettle not being part of that scourge of Africa, of being used against African progress.” This suggests a divide in public sentiment regarding the protests and their implications for political discourse in Zimbabwe.
The protests initiated by Blessed Geza have resulted in mixed reactions within Zimbabwe. While many citizens heeded the call to abstain from work, indicating discontent with President Emmerson Mnangagwa, official government representatives have downplayed the significance of the demonstrations. This situation highlights a complex intersection of political expression and public sentiment in the country.
Original Source: www.sabcnews.com
