The U.S. and Israel are considering resettling Gazans in Africa and Syria. Former President Trump suggested seeking humanitarian countries to accommodate Palestinians. However, local officials from Somalia and Sudan deny any such proposals, citing potential security risks and their unpreparedness for an influx of refugees.
The Trump administration and Israel are reportedly exploring the possibility of resettling Gazans in Sudan, Somalia, and Syria as part of a plan to rebuild Gaza. This proposal is driven by the idea of relocating 1.8 million Palestinians currently living in Gaza to countries willing to help, which Trump presented as a humanitarian initiative. He expressed optimism about finding nations with “humanitarian hearts” that could assist in this process.
In a subsequent press event, Trump clarified that no Palestinians would be forcibly removed, instead asserting that those wishing to leave Gaza would be able to make that decision. He emphasized that current conditions in Gaza are untenable due to widespread destruction and lack of basic services.
Despite these discussions, Somalia’s ambassador, Dahir Hassan, affirmed that there has been no official communication from U.S. or Israeli officials regarding such relocation plans. He cautioned that the circulation of unverified information might inadvertently assist extremist groups like ISIS and Al-Shabaab in their recruitment efforts, aggravating security issues in the region.
Officials from Sudan and Syria have similarly reported a lack of knowledge regarding any resettlement outreach from the U.S. or Israel, with Sudan engaged in a civil war that has displaced many. Somalia continues to grapple with the threat posed by Al-Shabaab, while Syria is in a precarious state of governance following the recent ousting of long-term leader Bashar al-Assad.
In summary, the proposal to resettle Gazans in Sudan, Somalia, and Syria raised by the Trump administration remains unsubstantiated by formal communications from the involved governments. Concerns regarding security implications and the suitability of these countries to absorb such populations are significant. Thus far, both Somalia and Sudan have reported no engagement on this matter, and the situation in Syria is tenuous as the new government seeks stability.
Original Source: www.inkl.com
