The Trump administration is considering a new travel ban targeting citizens from 43 countries, with a “red” list of 11 nations facing total entry bans and an “orange” list of 10 nations subject to restrictions. Inter-agency reviews are ongoing, suggesting potential modifications before final release.
The Trump administration is contemplating a new travel ban impacting up to 43 countries, a plan that potentially surpasses previous restrictions enacted during the former president’s tenure. Information derived from internal discussions indicates a draft list featuring different tiers of countries that may face entry restrictions into the United States.
Specifically, there exists a “red” list comprising 11 countries: Afghanistan, Bhutan, Cuba, Iran, Libya, North Korea, Somalia, Sudan, Syria, Venezuela, and Yemen, whose citizens would be entirely prohibited from entering the U.S. Officials have indicated that this list was compiled several weeks prior by the State Department, and it may undergo modifications before submission to the White House.
Embassy officials and regional bureaus within the State Department, along with security teams from various agencies, are currently assessing the draft. Their evaluations focus on the validity of the reported issues within each country and the strategic implications that may arise from these proposed restrictions, particularly concerning international cooperation on priority matters.
Additionally, the draft outlines an “orange” list comprising 10 countries where access would be limited rather than entirely barred. This tier may permit entry for affluent business travelers but would still restrict immigration and tourism visa holders from those nations.
In summary, the Trump administration’s proposed travel ban could affect citizens from 43 countries, categorized into distinct tiers. The “red” list highlights nations subject to complete entry restrictions, while the “orange” list allows limited access for certain travelers. Ongoing reviews by officials indicate that the proposal may be subject to revisions before finalization.
Original Source: www.nytimes.com
