Normalization between Israel and Lebanon is hindered by historical tensions and current geopolitical realities. Israeli officials believe discussions are part of a broader strategy, yet resistance movements, chiefly Hezbollah, remain strong. Israeli aspirations for peace are contingent upon overcoming significant opposition, notably Iran’s influence and local resistance efforts.
The prospect of normalization between Israel and Lebanon remains considerably remote, largely due to historical and ongoing tensions. The normalization process is viewed as a continuation of Israel’s aspiration to expand its influence in the region while destabilizing the resistance front. Recent statements from Israeli officials suggest that discussions with Lebanon are merely part of a larger strategic plan to impose Israel’s terms following military conflicts.
Israeli commentary reflects a belief that the resistance, particularly in Lebanon, has been diminished after suffering significant setbacks, including disrupted supply lines from Syria. The expectation is that a weakened Lebanese authority would yield more easily to Israeli demands. However, normalization hinges on defeating the Lebanese resistance, a goal that has been increasingly elusive, especially given Hezbollah’s popularity and support among the Lebanese populace.
Israeli Energy Minister Eli Cohen recently remarked that normalization with Lebanon is premature, acknowledging that any long-term agreement would need to neutralize Iranian influence in the region. Analysts suggest that Israel perceives more benefits from a normalization agreement than it can concede, confirming the colonial entity’s focus on maintaining military superiority in West Asia.
It is pertinent to note that despite efforts by Washington and Tel Aviv to promote normalization, numerous challenges persist. Historical attempts at normalization, such as the 1983 agreement, were quickly overturned by resistance movements, illustrating that Israeli plans often face significant opposition. Netanyahu’s previous statements underscore that peace cannot be realized in the presence of resistance, emphasizing Hezbollah’s critical role in thwarting normalization efforts.
In conclusion, normalization between Israel and Lebanon is fraught with historical animosities and current geopolitical complexities. Israel’s aspiration for normalization continues to clash with the resilience of Lebanese resistance, particularly represented by Hezbollah. As long as the resistance maintains popular support and the broader regional power dynamics remain volatile, the dream of normalization will remain distant.
Original Source: www.tehrantimes.com
