Pedro Castillo, the former President of Peru, ends a four-day hunger strike protesting his trial over charges of rebellion. He is detained since December 2022 after attempting to dissolve Congress. The prosecution seeks a 34-year prison sentence, while Castillo claims the trial is politicized. His removal from office sparked national protests resulting in fatalities. He also faces corruption investigations.
Former President Pedro Castillo of Peru has concluded a four-day hunger strike, protesting his trial on charges of rebellion and other serious offenses. Judicial authorities announced his decision to end the strike after Castillo was hospitalized on Thursday due to health concerns. He has been detained since December 7, 2022, following a controversial televised announcement aimed at dissolving Congress, which led to his immediate removal from office.
Now, Castillo is facing serious legal challenges, including charges of rebellion, grave abuse of authority, and disturbing public tranquility. With the prosecution seeking a severe 34-year imprisonment for Castillo, the trial has led to significant national polarization. The former president has labeled the proceedings as politically motivated and a mere “pantomime,” rejecting legal representation from judicial-appointed counsel.
His ousting, which marked the first time an Indigenous president led Peru, incited widespread protests, especially in the southern regions of the country, resulting in the tragic deaths of at least 49 individuals. Castillo, a rural school teacher with no prior political experience, previously won the presidency in the 2021 elections. In addition to the current trial, Castillo is under investigation for alleged corruption during his presidency.
In summary, former Peruvian President Pedro Castillo’s recent conclusion of a hunger strike highlights the ongoing tension surrounding his legal battles. With serious charges against him and a polarized national response, Castillo’s trial serves as a critical juncture in Peru’s political landscape. As he faces potential imprisonment, the ramifications of his presidency continue to evoke significant public sentiment and dissent.
Original Source: apnews.com
