The People’s Coalition for Civil Action (PCCA) criticizes IGAD’s recent statements on the R-ARCSS, arguing they misrepresent the peace process in South Sudan. PCCA highlights the ongoing violence, economic struggles, and governance failures that undermine claims of reducing conflict. The Coalition calls for a shift towards an inclusive political dialogue to effectively address the country’s challenges and urges IGAD to reassess its approach to the peace process.
The People’s Coalition for Civil Action (PCCA) has expressed significant disappointment regarding the Intergovernmental Authority on Development’s (IGAD) Report presented at the 43rd Extraordinary Summit concerning South Sudan. PCCA critiques statements within the Communiqué, which praises the Revitalized Agreement on the Resolution of the Conflict in South Sudan (R-ARCSS) as essential for peace, arguing that such assertions are misleading and counterproductive to genuine stability.
PCCA emphasizes that the R-ARCSS cannot be deemed a peace cornerstone, citing documented failures in its implementation and President Kiir’s repeated transgressions against the agreement. The resurgence of conflict, especially evident in Nasir, underscores growing frustrations with the R-ARCSS amid continued hostilities nationwide, despite previous claims of mitigating large-scale conflict.
Furthermore, the Coalition condemns the notion that the R-ARCSS has facilitated long-term development, stating that it has exacerbated economic challenges and failed to meet political transition prerequisites. PCCA condemns IGAD’s insistence on the R-ARCSS’s validity, believing it disrespects the suffering endured by the South Sudanese populace.
Despite the formation of an IGAD Ministerial-level sub-committee to oversee the R-ARCSS, PCCA argues that such measures lack clarity and fail to tackle the root causes of instability in South Sudan. The Coalition calls for addressing deeper issues, including succession politics and governance structures.
PCCA believes that continuing to frame South Sudan’s issues within the R-ARCSS context is counterproductive, advocating instead for an inclusive political dialogue free of the current leadership’s influences. They suggest that the focus should shift to dismantling divisionary tactics and uniting South Sudan under a new framework promoting accountability and democratic processes.
In summary, the People’s Coalition for Civil Action (PCCA) criticizes IGAD’s recent evaluations of the R-ARCSS, asserting they misrepresent the true state of affairs in South Sudan. The Coalition highlights the persistent conflict and economic hardship faced by the South Sudanese people, urging IGAD to reconsider its approach. PCCA advocates for a comprehensive political dialogue that encourages the engagement of diverse stakeholders, ultimately recommending steps toward a national roundtable for conversations on constitutional frameworks and elections.
Original Source: www.radiotamazuj.org
