Namibia aims to become a key producer of green hydrogen, hosting the Global African Hydrogen Summit in 2025. Shark Island, historically a site of colonial genocide, is at risk due to port expansion plans that could overlook its traumatic legacy. Campaigners advocate for reconciliation, emphasizing the importance of local communities and historical recognition in energy development. The relationship between Namibia’s resources and its colonial past highlights concerns of energy colonialism and calls for justice.
In September 2025, Namibia will be the host of the Global African Hydrogen Summit, where the government aims to establish the country as a significant producer of green hydrogen for export, particularly to Europe. However, the areas crucial for this energy transition are inextricably linked to the traumatic legacy of colonial violence, notably the ocean, which serves as the final resting place for numerous Namibians.
Shark Island, an oft-overlooked peninsula in Namibia, has been earmarked for the production of green hydrogen. This island, along with its waters, faces potential jeopardy from planned port expansions intended to facilitate the transport of this green energy. Historically known as Death Island, Shark Island functioned as a concentration camp during the German colonial period from 1884 to 1915, representing a site of extreme violence, although much of the physical evidence has been erased.
During the early 20th century, German colonial rulers, following the annexation by Adolf Lüderitz, perpetrated a genocide that resulted in the deaths of approximately 100,000 Namibians, including significant portions of the Herero and Nama populations. Survivors were often forced into concentration camps where they endured brutal labor, further deepening the historical trauma.
Notably, investigations by Forensic Architecture have digitally reconstructed the sites of these camps and indicated the risk that proposed port expansions pose to Shark Island. While much focus has been on land-based elements of the green hydrogen projects, the ocean—a crucial space of memory, justice, and relations—is often neglected, particularly in light of colonial histories that have marginalized local communities.
The legacy of colonial rule is evidenced by the manner in which German forces incarcerated Namibians at sea and disposed of their bodies in the ocean. The expression, “the sea will take you,” underscores the intertwined memories of death and trauma associated with these events. Efforts are ongoing among Namibian groups to honor the memories of the deceased by restoring grave sites and establishing memorials, advocating for recognition and equitable access to coastal resources.
As a prospective leader in green hydrogen production, Namibia is seen as a critical part of Europe’s strategy for decarbonization, characterized by its abundant renewable resources. However, the realization of hydrogen production is contingent upon the availability of appropriate infrastructure, necessitating expansions at ports like Walvis Bay and Lüderitz, which threaten the integrity of Shark Island.
Local campaigners have called for a cessation of port expansion plans, urging the government and industry to engage more seriously in reconciliation efforts. The influence of European nations in Namibia’s green and blue economy highlights ongoing energy colonialism, as the quest for green energy perpetuates historical injustices while satisfying European climate agendas.
Collaborations between Namibia and countries like Germany reveal neocolonial dynamics. While intended to promote partnership, these initiatives frequently alienate local communities from their land and disregard environmental and cultural contexts. Through mechanisms of “development assistance,” the German government continues to shape Namibian economic projects without addressing the need for reparative justice.
Black Court Studio plays a pivotal role in redefining the relationship between the ocean and the historical narratives of violence. By incorporating community engagement and alternative mapping, the studio seeks to reclaim the buried connections to Shark Island, emphasizing the ongoing cultural and spiritual ties despite historical dispossession. Namibia’s maritime environment is not merely an exploitable resource for European interests but a vital part of the dialogue surrounding historical injustices and the importance of meaningful reconciliation.
The intersection of Namibia’s green hydrogen ambitions and its colonial history raises significant concerns regarding justice and remembrance. As Europe seeks sustainable energy solutions, the legacy of colonialism must be acknowledged, particularly regarding the sites of historical trauma like Shark Island. Transparent discussions about land use, community rights, and reparatory justice are essential to ensuring that Namibia’s development is equitable and honors its poignant history. Ultimately, reconciling with the past is crucial for fostering a more just future.
Original Source: www.inkl.com
