Iran Signals Openness to Nuclear Talks Under Specific Conditions

Iran has indicated it may consider nuclear talks if they address militarization concerns only, but it will not discuss dismantling its nuclear program. This position was clarified by the Iranian mission to the UN, emphasizing that they will reject any talks aimed at disbanding their peaceful nuclear efforts.

Iran has expressed a conditional willingness to engage in discussions regarding its nuclear program, specifically on the potential militarization aspects. The Iranian authorities, however, firmly assert that they will never entertain talks aimed at the complete dismantling of their nuclear program.

An official statement from the Iranian mission to the United Nations, relayed through News.Az via TASS, clarifies their position, stating, “If the goal of the talks is to resolve concerns about the potential militarization of Iran’s nuclear program, then such issues can be discussed.”

Furthermore, the Iranian representatives emphasized that discussions aimed at disbanding Iran’s peaceful nuclear program—similar to goals pursued during Barack Obama’s presidency—will be categorically rejected. They insisted that if negotiations are intended to achieve what previous administrations could not, those talks would never proceed.

In summary, Iran’s stance on nuclear discussions reveals a willingness to address militarization concerns but a resolute opposition to dismantling its nuclear capabilities. This position highlights the complexities surrounding the negotiations and underscores the Iranian commitment to maintaining its nuclear program, even under international scrutiny.

Original Source: news.az

About Carmen Mendez

Carmen Mendez is an engaging editor and political journalist with extensive experience. After completing her degree in journalism at Yale University, she worked her way up through the ranks at various major news organizations, holding positions from staff writer to editor. Carmen is skilled at uncovering the nuances of complex political scenarios and is an advocate for transparent journalism.

View all posts by Carmen Mendez →

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *