Sudan has accused the UAE of complicity in genocide amid a civil war, alleging the Gulf state’s support for the RSF, which has been battling the regular army for almost two years. The complaint has been filed with the International Court of Justice, intensifying discussions about foreign involvement in the conflict and highlighting Sudan’s rich natural resources.
Sudan has formally accused the United Arab Emirates (UAE) of complicity in genocide in a filing submitted to the International Court of Justice. This allegation has drawn increased attention to the UAE’s purported role in the ongoing civil war within Sudan, notably concerning support for the rebel paramilitary group, the Rapid Support Forces (RSF). The UAE has consistently denied such claims.
Sudan, which is rich in natural resources, including vast agricultural lands, natural gas, and gold—making it the third-largest gold producer in Africa—has experienced significant turmoil. The nation shares borders with Libya, where the UAE has been known to support rebel factions, and features a coastline along the Red Sea, a key maritime pathway for oil transport.
In 2021, a coup d’état led to the seizure of power by Sudan’s army chief, Abdel Fattah al-Burhan, alongside his deputy, the RSF commander, Mohamed Hamdan Dagalo, also known as Hemedti. Following two years of consolidation, violence erupted between these two military leaders, prompting allegations from various nations, including the UAE, Egypt, Turkey, Iran, and Russia, of involvement in supporting different factions during this conflict.
In summary, Sudan’s accusation against the UAE highlights the complexities of the ongoing civil war, elucidating the roles of foreign influence and support among conflicting factions. The allegations of complicity in genocide place significant scrutiny on international involvement in Sudan’s turmoil, especially concerning the Rapid Support Forces and their confrontation with the regular army.
Original Source: www.scmp.com
