Sudan’s military government is suing the UAE in the ICJ for allegedly supplying arms to the RSF. Hussein Shingrai stated that the war could have ended earlier without such support. The UAE has rejected the accusations, calling the case a publicity stunt, while Sudan insists on the validity of their claims.
A Sudanese political leader has asserted that the military-led government possesses the legitimate right to bring legal action against the United Arab Emirates (UAE) for allegedly supplying arms to the Rapid Support Forces (RSF). Hussein Shingrai, who holds the position of foreign affairs secretary of the People’s Democratic Party of Sudan, indicated that any support from the UAE prolongs the conflict, stating that the war might have concluded by now otherwise.
The International Court of Justice (ICJ) has recognized Sudan’s accusation against the UAE, which alleges that the latter has breached the genocide convention through its arms supply and funding of the RSF rebels. In response to the lawsuit, the UAE has characterized the case as a mere publicity stunt, signaling their dismissal of the allegations. Shingrai further emphasized the gravity of the issue during an interview, conveying the significance of the evidence at hand.
In summary, the Sudanese government defends its decision to take the UAE to the International Court of Justice over allegations of arming the RSF. The Sudanese leaders contend that such foreign support has exacerbated the ongoing conflict. Meanwhile, the UAE has controversially dismissed these allegations as a publicity stunt, leading to further tension between the nations involved.
Original Source: www.voaafrica.com
