Sudan has filed a case against the UAE at the ICJ, claiming complicity in genocide through support for the RSF. The UAE denies the accusations, labeling the case a publicity stunt. The conflict has led to significant humanitarian crises in Darfur, with millions displaced and numerous human rights violations reported.
Sudan has filed a formal complaint against the United Arab Emirates at the International Court of Justice, alleging that the UAE has breached the Genocide Convention by providing direct support to the Rapid Support Forces (RSF) during the ongoing conflict in Sudan. The Sudanese government claims that such support contributes to atrocities against the Masalit community, including genocide, murder, and various human rights violations. The court’s statement details these allegations and highlights the broader humanitarian crisis resulting from the conflict, which has displaced millions and led to widespread famine.
The UAE has responded to these claims by describing them as a “cynical publicity stunt,” expressing its intention to seek immediate dismissal of the case. The UAE has consistently denied providing assistance to the RSF, which has been engaged in a violent struggle against opposing factions, including the Sudanese army. The conflict has dramatically intensified over the past two years, with tens of thousands reported killed and over 12 million people displaced from their homes.
In the context of Darfur, violent confrontations have mainly occurred between the RSF and fighters from nomadic Arab tribes against the non-Arab Masalit people, raising allegations of genocidal acts. Although the RSF denies any involvement in violence against civilians, reports indicate recent attacks on refugee camps in the region. In January, the United States classified the RSF’s actions in Darfur as genocidal.
The Sudanese government has requested the ICJ to impose provisional measures, including the obligation for the UAE to pay reparations and prevent any supported armed groups from committing violations against the Masalit people, as per the Genocide Convention. While ICJ rulings are binding, they lack enforcement power, illustrated by previous instances where the court’s directives were disregarded by other nations.
In summary, Sudan’s legal action against the UAE at the International Court of Justice centers on allegations of complicity in genocide against the Masalit people via support for the RSF. The UAE refutes these claims, labeling them as a mere publicity ploy. The ongoing conflict has had devastating humanitarian repercussions, prompting Sudan to seek reparations and preventive measures against further violations.
Original Source: www.aljazeera.com
