This article discusses the RutoMustGo resistance in Kenya, examining its impact and long-term sustainability. It highlights the need for a solid foundation, organizational support, and a clear ideological position to effectively challenge the comprador government. The report emphasizes ongoing struggles within the working class and the importance of unity and awareness in advocating for change in Kenya.
The ongoing RutoMustGo resistance in Kenya has garnered considerable attention due to its representation by the youth and other activists. Although these activities signify an essential step in the resistance movement, they are unlikely to have lasting power without a solid foundation. Resistance actions foster political awareness and enhance class consciousness among the populace, yet they cannot serve as a conclusive solution against the comprador government.
The anticipated overthrow of President Ruto is an unrealistic aspiration, as the resistance must operate as a long-term movement. With challenges such as potential isolation by the regime and dwindling support, the activists face hurdles to sustain momentum. Historical analysis indicates that street protests alone cannot endure without grasping the underlying power dynamics between the government and the resistance fighters.
Ruto’s regime holds significant political and financial power, culminating in control over governmental institutions, law enforcement, and media. In contrast, the fragmented opposition lacks the organizational backing of labor and peasant movements, which may lead to the activists facing direct threats without a cohesive defense. The absence of an organized labor response further complicates their efforts, as state repression is coupled with their day-to-day struggles for survival.
Another critical shortcoming of the current resistance is the lack of a definitive ideological foundation, which hampers unity and collective strength among the victims of capitalism. Historical contexts such as the Mau Mau movement are referenced to underscore the necessity of declaring explicit aims, such as “Land and Freedom,” to galvanize support from workers and peasants. In comparison, the present resistance lacks a clear vision, which contributes to its struggles.
Unity among the working class and its allies is fundamental for successfully challenging the comprador government. Although there is current resistance from workers, it often remains obscured by the ruling class. Instead of engaging with the broader class dynamics, discussions typically center around resistance actions. There lies a significant gap in understanding the balance of power, which hampers recognition of ongoing struggles among workers and peasants.
Recent reports illustrate mounting tensions in neighborhoods like Marengo and Gikomba, characterized by violent clashes between youth and law enforcement following police shootings. These protests reveal the repercussions of state repression, where legitimate opposition is silenced and workers are denied unionization, land rights, and essential freedoms.
While immediate focus is directed towards organized resistance movements like RutoMustGo, a larger undercurrent of resistance exists. Initially subdued, this force may be pivotal in determining Kenya’s future: it holds the potential for liberation from imperialism or, conversely, could lead to chaos if exploited by external interests.
In conclusion, while the RutoMustGo resistance plays a notable role in mobilizing opposition in Kenya, its sustainability remains questionable due to a lack of long-term strategy, organizational support, and ideological clarity. Recognizing the critical need for unity among the working class and addressing the power imbalances will be essential for effective resistance against the comprador government. Future movements must articulate a clear vision to engage and mobilize the broader populace, ensuring that their struggles against oppressive systems are recognized and supported.
Original Source: countercurrents.org
