Brazil ranks second in judicial spending worldwide, dedicating 1.33% of GDP to the judiciary, significantly higher than the global average. This spending totals R$ 156.6 billion, with a substantial portion funding salaries for judges and court personnel. El Salvador leads with 1.59% of GDP designated for judiciary expenses.
According to recent data from the Brazilian Ministry of Finance, Brazil’s judiciary spending ranks second globally, surpassed only by El Salvador. This spending constitutes 1.33% of the nation’s Gross Domestic Product (GDP), significantly above the international standard of 0.3%. The report, based on 2022 data, underscores Brazil’s considerable commitment to its judicial system, attributed to high expenditures in this sector.
In absolute numbers, Brazil’s judicial expenditure amounted to R$ 156.6 billion (approximately $26 billion USD) as of December 2023. A substantial portion of this budget, R$ 125.6 billion (about $22 billion USD), was allocated for judges and court employees’ salaries, making up 80.2% of the total judicial expenditure. This allocation indicates the judiciary’s substantial influence on Brazil’s public budget.
By comparison, El Salvador leads with 1.59% of its GDP devoted to judicial expenses. The high ranking in judicial spending reflects the government’s prioritization of justice and legal frameworks within national policy, emphasizing the essential role of the judiciary in society. While inquiries directed to the National Council of Justice (CNJ) regarding spending levels were pending at the time of reporting, the findings highlight the ongoing financial commitment to the judiciary in Brazil.
In summary, Brazil’s judicial spending, accounting for 1.33% of its GDP, positions it second globally only to El Salvador. The significant financial resources allocated highlight the Brazilian government’s prioritization of its judicial system, with a majority directed towards salaries. The current emphasis on judicial expenditure reflects broader policies supporting legal and social frameworks, despite pending responses from the National Council of Justice regarding specific trends.
Original Source: www1.folha.uol.com.br
