India has condemned the UN Human Rights Chief’s statements about Kashmir and Manipur as unfounded and lacking context. Arindam Bagchi, India’s representative to the UN, emphasized the need for a more accurate perception of India’s realities, highlighting its democratic progress. He criticized the use of loose terminology and oversimplification of complex issues within the UN’s updates, calling for a better understanding of India’s diversity.
India has firmly criticized the remarks made by UN High Commissioner for Human Rights Volker Turk during the 58th session of the United Nations Human Rights Council. India’s Permanent Representative, Arindam Bagchi, labeled Turk’s comments regarding Kashmir and Manipur as “unfounded and baseless,” highlighting the use of loose terminology and selective representations of issues.
Bagchi asserted that India, recognized as the world’s largest democracy, is a vibrant and pluralistic society. He insisted that concerns echoed in the UN update do not accurately reflect the realities in India. “The people of India have repeatedly proven wrong such misplaced concerns about us,” he noted, seeking a more nuanced understanding of India’s diverse society.
Addressing the mention of Kashmir specifically, Bagchi called it an “erroneous” reference. He pointed out the positive developments in Jammu and Kashmir, emphasizing progress in peace, development, and civic involvement. He stated that the region has experienced noticeable improvements, including large turnout elections and a flourishing tourism sector, underscoring the need for the UN update to also reflect these advancements.
Moreover, Bagchi expressed apprehension about the generalizations presented in the UN’s updates, indicating that these remarks often oversimplify complex matters. He expressed a desire for the UN High Commissioner’s office to engage in a thorough self-evaluation to better address the pervasive unease identified in their assessments.
In summary, India’s response to the UN High Commissioner’s remarks underscores a commitment to counter what it sees as misrepresentations of its societal realities, particularly concerning Kashmir and the ongoing progress within its democracy.
In conclusion, India has articulated strong objections to the UN High Commissioner’s comments on Kashmir and Manipur, asserting that such remarks are unfounded and detached from the ground realities. India’s emphasis on its progress and pluralistic nature reflects a call for a deeper understanding of its diverse landscape. The criticism of oversimplifications in global updates indicates a desire for a more accurate representation of complex issues.
Original Source: www.hindustantimes.com
