The Tumaini Peace Talks in Nairobi on December 4, 2024, marked a significant step towards addressing the ongoing conflict in South Sudan. High attendance indicated global commitment to peace. The discussions emphasized inclusiveness and the integration of Tumaini outcomes with the 2018 R-ARCSS. Key challenges remain, particularly around the protocols, yet the overall atmosphere fosters cautious optimism for reconciliation.
On December 4, 2024, I participated as an observer in the Tumaini Peace Talks held in Nairobi, which garnered significant attention from both regional and international dignitaries. This turnout reflects the continued global commitment to a peaceful resolution for South Sudan, despite competing global challenges. The opening remarks by Gen. Kuol Manyang emphasized the importance of historical leaders, thereby laying a foundation for unity.
I noted a shift in the RTGoNU’s stance regarding the Tumaini Talks, moving from viewing them as a mere addendum to integrating their outcomes with the 2018 R-ARCSS. This evolution indicates a recognition of the importance of both frameworks working together for the peaceful future of South Sudan. Gen. Pagan Amum’s acknowledgment of past efforts underlines the need for a cohesive approach.
Furthermore, the ongoing dialogue demonstrates a push for inclusiveness, particularly the participation of Gen. Thomas Cirillo and Gen. Simon Gatwech. Addressing their engagement in the negotiations is crucial, even if it requires facilitating separate discussions to ensure their perspectives are heard. This could enhance the overall effectiveness of the peace process.
There was some ambiguity surrounding the timeline for concluding the Tumaini Talks, specifically the two-week directive from Presidents Salva Kiir and William Ruto. Gen. Lazarus Sumbeiywo, the Chief Mediator, clarified this urgency, aiming for a conclusion that delivers a peace agreement to the people of South Sudan before the holiday season.
Divergent views emerged about the current protocols. The RTGoNU expressed a need for adjustments to avoid redundancy and assure effective implementation, whereas the Opposition Groups firmly rejected any renegotiation of these protocols. This tension highlights the challenges and sensitivities in reaching a mutually beneficial agreement that respects previous commitments.
With the clarity and expressed commitment from all parties, the key differences appear manageable and could be resolved quickly. Notably, Professor Pauline Riak emphasized the necessity of prioritizing the populace’s suffering and reiterated that failure to achieve peace would be unacceptable. My engagement left me hopeful regarding the Tumaini Initiative’s potential to bring about meaningful change in South Sudan, embodying the essence of “Tumaini,” or hope, which serves as a powerful catalyst for transformation.
The Tumaini Initiative represents a significant opportunity for restoring peace in South Sudan. With a commitment from both the RTGoNU and opposition parties to address past frameworks collaboratively, there is cautious optimism. While challenges in negotiations remain, the emphasis on inclusivity and prioritizing the needs of South Sudanese citizens suggests the potential for meaningful resolution. Ultimately, the success of these talks is imperative, as the stakes for the people of South Sudan are exceedingly high.
Original Source: www.radiotamazuj.org
