This article proposes that Egypt absorb a large portion of the Gazan population into Sinai, which is underpopulated and has vast potential. It argues for the necessity of freedom of movement for Gazans, suggests that Egypt should take responsibility for Gaza, and emphasizes the need for a reevaluation of U.S.-Egypt and Israel-Egypt relations in order to effectively address the situation in Gaza.
The Gaza Strip, home to about 2.2 million individuals within 360 square kilometers, is severely overcrowded and economically challenged. In contrast, Sinai covers 60,000 square kilometers and has a population of roughly 600,000, making Gaza’s population density drastically higher. Ethnically and culturally, the people of Gaza and Sinai are similar, sharing language, religion, and familial connections, particularly around the Rafah area that lies on the border of both regions.
Sinai currently struggles with criminal activities like drug smuggling and human trafficking, underutilizing its vast potential for agriculture and solar energy. The underused El-Arish port could become a thriving hub for Gaza, benefitting both Egyptians and Gazans. Relocating one million Gazans to Sinai aligns with President Trump’s proposed initiative, potentially leading to job creation and economic advancement.
The fundamental requirement for this solution is unrestricted freedom of movement, enabling many Gazans to choose to emigrate voluntarily. Criticisms regarding the morality or politics of such relocations are unsubstantiated, especially given the international acceptance of refugees from Syria and Ukraine. Egypt must facilitate this process by reopening the Rafah border, allowing for the mass relocation of Gazans who would likely take the opportunity.
The current Egyptian regime has grown increasingly reliant on the United States and Israel, especially for security and financial support. Past instances, such as the ISIS crisis in Sinai, demonstrate Israel’s critical role in aiding Egypt. This intricate relationship necessitates a reevaluation; Egypt must actively participate in addressing the Gaza situation rather than perpetuating it to maintain its mediating status.
The notion arises that Egypt’s strategic interests may compel it to sustain the Gaza crisis, thus keeping Israel engaged with Hamas and profiting from trade across Rafah. Furthermore, Egypt’s military buildup, ostensibly directed at Israel, raises questions about regional security dynamics. Therein lies a need for reassessing U.S.-Egypt and Israel-Egypt relationships, urging a more balanced approach that includes demands on Egypt’s part.
Egypt should take responsibility for Gaza, reminiscent of its management prior to 1967, with the support of the Arab League’s resources. By ensuring the provision of essential services to the remaining one million Palestinians in Gaza, Egypt can play a pivotal role in stabilizing the region. Trump’s proposal presents a viable method to alleviate persistent issues in the area, fostering growth and reducing violence.
Endeavors by the U.S. and Israel must focus on persuading Egypt to contribute actively to Trump’s vision and to counter unfounded arguments against it. A comprehensive and innovative approach is essential in transforming the situation positively. The author, as the leader of the Yisrael Beytenu Party and a former foreign minister of Israel, articulates these views with a focus on regional peace and economic development.
In conclusion, a strategic relocation of Gazans to the Sinai could alleviate overcrowding and foster economic growth. A collaborative effort involving Egypt, the U.S., and Israel is essential for success. Rethinking current relations and ensuring Egypt’s active participation in managing Gaza could pave the way for a lasting solution. Moreover, adopting an innovative mindset is crucial to addressing the challenges faced in the region effectively.
Original Source: www.jpost.com
