Steve Witkoff, the US Middle East envoy, suggested that Lebanon and Syria might normalize relations with Israel amid regional political shifts. He noted the weakening of Iran-linked groups as a backdrop for these potential developments. Despite current legal restrictions in Lebanon on Israeli relations, discussions about normalization continue, with significant geopolitical implications following ongoing conflicts and military engagements between Israel and both nations.
Steve Witkoff, the US Middle East envoy, asserted during a recent event organized by the American Jewish Committee that Lebanon and Syria could soon establish normalized relations with Israel. He cited ongoing political transformations in the region as potential catalysts for these developments, including the weakening of Iran-affiliated groups such as Hezbollah and the recent challenges faced by Bashar Al-Assad’s regime in Syria.
Witkoff expressed, “In terms of the Iranian crescent, it has been basically decimated. Look at what’s happened with Syria; we’ve got an epic election in Lebanon, and tons of things happening.” He suggested that both Lebanon and Syria could potentially mobilize to join the Abraham Peace Accords, referencing profound changes in the region.
This idea echoes sentiments previously voiced by Israel’s Foreign Minister Israel Katz, who indicated that Lebanon might pursue diplomatic relations with Israel contingent on Saudi Arabia taking similar steps. Currently, Lebanon does not recognize Israel, and Lebanese nationals are legally barred from visiting the country, while entry for individuals with Israeli passports is prohibited.
Yasser Zaatreh, a Palestinian writer and political analyst, criticized Witkoff’s remarks, labeling them a tragedy in light of Israel’s recent military actions in both Lebanon and Syria. He commented on the perceived hubris of US leadership by stating, “Trump and his gang of thugs think they are Gods in the universe, they give orders and are obeyed.”
Both Lebanon and Syria have faced significant repercussions from Israel’s ongoing conflict in Gaza, particularly since the outbreak of war in September 2024, which resulted in over 4,000 Lebanese casualties. Israel’s military actions escalated to an invasion of southern Lebanon in October, further straining relations.
In Syria, Israel’s attacks have targeted sites associated with Hezbollah and Iranian influence while conducting operations in regions close to the Golan Heights. Following the collapse of Assad’s regime, Israeli forces have ramped up their military strikes in southern Syria.
Lebanese parliament member Wael Abou Faour remarked that Lebanon’s most likely course of action would be to pursue a truce agreement with Israel, akin to those established in 1949. He emphasized the necessity for national unity amidst external pressures for normalization with Israel.
Amid these tensions, Israel has stated its intention to maintain control over key strategic points in southern Lebanon, despite failing to meet its withdrawal deadline. Witkoff conveyed optimism for Saudi Arabia’s potential normalization with Israel, positing it as part of the broader Abraham Accords strategy, though Riyadh has maintained that relations will not be established without an independent Palestinian state in place.
In summary, the discourse around Lebanon and Syria’s potential normalization with Israel highlights significant political shifts and ongoing conflicts in the region. US envoy Witkoff’s comments reflect optimism for diplomatic developments, yet the historical context of hostilities and current geopolitical dynamics present formidable challenges. Furthermore, the ongoing Israeli military actions in both Lebanon and Syria complicate any prospects for peace and stability in the region. Future relations will hinge on broader agreements, including the establishment of a Palestinian state and prevailing political unity within Lebanon and Syria.
Original Source: www.newarab.com
