Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces and allies have signed a charter to form a parallel government in rebel-held areas, amidst ongoing conflict and humanitarian crises. The charter advocates for a democratic state and aims to unify military forces. This development, however, raises concerns about the potential for increased fragmentation of the country and tensions with the army-aligned government.
The Rapid Support Forces (RSF) of Sudan and their allies have committed to establishing a competing government in a move announced on Sunday. This charter, signed in Nairobi, aims to create a “government of peace and unity” in regions controlled by rebel factions, occurring amidst an ongoing war that has displaced over 12 million individuals.
The agreement was signed by factions including the Sudan People’s Liberation Movement-North (SPLM-N) and is viewed as an indication of defiance against established authorities. The charter outlines a vision for a secular and democratic Sudan, promoting equality and establishing a unified national military.
The conflict, stemming from disputes over military integration, has led to severe humanitarian crises and accusations of atrocities from both sides. The RSF currently operates in regions significantly impacted by violence, while the Sudanese Armed Forces are attempting to regain control of Khartoum.
Foreign Minister Ali Youssef from the army-aligned government dismissed any recognition of this new parallel government. The RSF’s partnership with SPLM-N gives them strategic regional advantages, but concerns remain that this move may exacerbate Sudan’s fragmentation.
International observers, including UN officials, have cautioned that the creation of this rival government could further destabilize Sudan. However, representatives of the signatories advocate that the charter serves to enhance the delivery of essential services to those in RSF-controlled territories.
Analysts speculate that the RSF’s actions are motivated by a desire to solidify political leverage following recent combat setbacks. The overarching goal appears to be to transition from militia status to an officially recognized governing body, despite existing arms embargoes against such developments.
Kenya’s facilitation of the charter’s signing has led to diplomatic tensions, as Sudan’s army-aligned government protested the event, accusing Kenya of aligning with interests contrary to Sudan’s stability. The geopolitical implications of this partnership remain complex, particularly regarding arms supplies from regional powers such as the United Arab Emirates.
The recent signing of a charter by Sudan’s RSF and allies marks a significant escalation in the country’s conflict, as it aims to establish a rival government amidst a devastating humanitarian crisis. Despite promises of unity and peace, concerns about further fragmentation of Sudan persist, and the international response to this development could have lasting implications for regional stability.
Original Source: www.france24.com
