Iran’s military bases in Syria now lie abandoned following a swift and chaotic retreat. The remnants illustrate a lack of preparation and internal discord among Iranian forces and their Syrian allies. Local sentiments have shifted, showing relief at the departure of Iranian troops, while the new regime distances itself from Iran, marking a significant change in Syria’s geopolitical landscape.
Iran’s abandoned military bases in Syria are stark remnants of a hasty retreat, revealing a disordered and panicked departure. Within the facilities, one can find mouldy food, old uniforms, and abandoned weapons, illustrating the abrupt end of a decade of military presence. The situation, characterized by a chaotic evacuation, reflects both the rapid downfall of Iranian influence in Syria and internal discord among their allies.
The base near Khan Shaykhun in Idlib province was once a pivotal location for Iranian forces. It is marked by a hidden entrance and a watchtower adorned with the Iranian flag. Receipts for ordinary supplies, such as chocolates and cooking oil, suggest that the base operated normally until the last moments of the retreat.
The new occupants, Uyghur fighters from Hayaat Tahrir al-Sham (HTS), now inhabit the site. One of them stated, “Iranians were here. They all fled,” highlighting the sudden shift in control. The compound is a network of tunnels with remnants of Iranian culture and military paraphernalia, standing as a monument to their presence until the very end.
Documents found at the base contained sensitive information concerning Iranian affiliates, particularly Afghan fighters who were active there. The Iranian regime justified its military involvement in Syria as a defense against extremist groups and to protect Shia interests. However, the rapid retreat indicates that they were caught unprepared and disorganized.
As chaos ensued, orders came late, causing a quick evacuation to places such as Iraq and Lebanon. An HTS fighter remarked on the unexpected speed of their operations, while external pressures, including Israeli airstrikes, compounded the situation. Ultimately, a rift emerged between President Assad and Iranian leaders, leading to deep mistrust.
Moreover, the local population’s sentiments towards Iran shifted negatively, contrasting with their comparatively neutral stance towards Russia. A local resident articulated the hardships experienced under Iranian control, recalling the oppressive atmosphere within the community. Others expressed relief at the departure of Iranian troops, viewing it as an end to an occupation.
Syria’s new regime has begun distancing itself from Iran, imposing bans on Iranian nationals while maintaining a more favorable view of Russian presence. The Iranian embassy remains closed, and Iranian leaders exhibit mixed reactions toward developments in Syria. The new interim leader indicated an intention to redefine relations with Tehran while asserting that the era of Iranian influence has concluded, showcasing a significant turnaround in Syria’s post-war landscape.
In conclusion, the abandoned bases serve as a testament to the collapse of the Iranian military presence in Syria. The swift evacuation and the subsequent takeover by local groups reflect not only a change in control but a shift in public perception regarding foreign interventions in Syria. Iran’s once-stronghold is now in disarray, underscoring both military and political defeats that will impact regional dynamics for the foreseeable future.
In sum, the sudden abandonment of Iran’s military bases in Syria highlights the rapid decline of Iran’s influence in the region. Documented rifts between Iran and Syrian leadership, compounded by military setbacks, led to an unexpected exit. This shift signifies a substantial change in the political landscape of Syria, impacting future relations with local and regional players.
Original Source: www.bbc.com
