Tagaddum, Sudan’s main civilian coalition, has officially split into factions due to differing views on forming a parallel government amid ongoing military conflicts. This separation arises from disputes led by Deputy Chairperson al-Hadi Idris, challenging the legitimacy of the current administration. Each faction will now operate independently, formulating unique strategies focused on sustainable peace and democratic governance.
Sudan’s principal civilian coalition, Tagaddum, has officially separated into factions following disagreements regarding the formation of a parallel government. This split underscores the increasing tensions within the coalition, which has been exacerbated by the ongoing conflict between the Sudanese army and the Rapid Support Forces militia (RSF).
The separation was prompted by Deputy Chairperson al-Hadi Idris’s advocacy for establishing a civilian government aimed at challenging the legitimacy of the administration appointed by General Abdel Fattah al-Burhan. In an official statement, Tagaddum acknowledged the need for a formal split, given the divergent perspectives within its ranks.
Tagaddum stated, “The most appropriate option is to separate those holding the two positions, so that each can work under a separate political and organizational platform with two new and different names.” Consequently, each faction will pursue its unique strategies focused on ceasing hostilities, achieving sustainable peace, and fostering democratic civilian governance.
While not explicitly naming the groups opposing the parallel government, Tagaddum indicated that these factions constitute a majority within the coalition. Supporters of the proposed government include former Sovereignty Council members such as al-Hadi Idris and al-Tahir Hajar, as well as Suleiman Sandal from the Justice and Equality Movement.
As one of Sudan’s largest civilian political alliances, Tagaddum’s divisions emerged particularly after a recent committee was formed to address escalating conflicts concerning the RSF-controlled areas. The Sudanese government also unveiled a roadmap for the post-conflict period, which incorporates establishing a technocratic government and initiating national dialogue as the army claims territorial gains against the RSF.
The official statement from the Sudanese Ministry of Foreign Affairs outlined the government’s agenda, which calls for disarmament by conflicting groups and the lifting of the RSF siege of El Fasher prior to any ceasefire negotiations.
In conclusion, the fracturing of the Tagaddum coalition reflects significant ideological divisions regarding governance in Sudan, particularly in the context of ongoing conflict. Each faction’s separation implies a strategic shift aimed at addressing the complex political landscape. As the Sudanese government seeks to navigate its post-conflict future, the success of these factions will be crucial for restoring peace and democratic governance in the region.
Original Source: www.dailynewsegypt.com
