German Chancellor Olaf Scholz criticized Donald Trump’s Gaza ownership proposal as a “scandal” during a February 2025 debate with challenger Friedrich Merz. Scholz’s remarks focused on legal and ethical implications of population relocation. Merz agreed but suggested that the U.S. rhetoric may not hold substantial intent. The discussion also covered gender recognition and U.S.-EU trade relations.
In a pre-election debate held on February 9, 2025, German Chancellor Olaf Scholz condemned former U.S. President Donald Trump’s proposal to take ownership of the Gaza Strip, labeling it a “scandal.” Scholz criticized the notion of relocating the population and emphasized the inappropriateness of such rhetoric, particularly as Gaza currently faces significant destruction. Scholz remarked, “The relocation of populations is unacceptable and against international law.”
Challenger Friedrich Merz echoed Scholz’s concerns, describing Trump’s suggestions as disconcerting yet hinted at a potential overemphasis on rhetoric. On other topics such as Trump’s directive recognizing only two genders, Merz expressed his understanding, while Scholz opposed the notion, affirming that individuals should embrace their identities freely. Merz characterized Trump as “predictably unpredictable,” stressing the necessity for European unity.
In response to queries about dealing with U.S. tariffs against the EU, Scholz assured that the European Union is prepared to act swiftly, signaling a readiness to respond to trade challenges. He reiterated his strategy of engaging with Trump through direct communication while advocating for shared European values and unity.
The remarks by Chancellor Olaf Scholz during the debate reflect the heightened scrutiny surrounding American foreign policy under President Trump, particularly regarding sensitive issues in the Middle East. Scholz’s criticism of the proposal to relocate populations from Gaza underscores international legal standards concerning population displacement. Additionally, the political context involves upcoming elections in Germany and the candidates’ varying approaches to U.S.-EU relations and domestic cultural issues.
The debate highlighted significant differences in perspectives regarding U.S. foreign policy proposals and domestic cultural issues. Scholz’s strong denouncement of Trump’s Gaza proposal contrasted with Merz’s more measured response, emphasizing the need for unity within Europe. Furthermore, as both candidates prepare for the upcoming election, their differing views on the implications of U.S. policies will influence their political strategies.
Original Source: apnews.com
