Interim Syrian President Ahmed al-Sharaa’s visits to Ankara and Saudi Arabia indicate his delicate balancing act between these regional powers. Sharaa’s relationship with Turkey is crucial for reconstruction efforts. Despite Ankara’s assistance, Sharaa’s alignment with Saudi interests demonstrates a need for broader international engagement, amidst a competitive geopolitical environment.
Syria’s interim President Ahmed al-Sharaa recently visited Ankara, following a trip to Saudi Arabia. This visit is seen as a strategic effort by Sharaa to balance the influence of Turkey and Saudi Arabia in the ongoing power struggle over Syria. Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan warmly welcomed Sharaa, expressing intentions of fostering a lasting partnership. He emphasized cooperation in Syria’s reconstruction and expressed hope for strong ties between their nations.
During his visit, Sharaa acknowledged Turkey’s substantial support for Syria, highlighting the ongoing efforts to maintain the country’s sovereignty and territorial integrity. Sharaa previously developed close relations with Turkey during the Syrian conflict, with Turkish military protection in the Idlib region where he was based.
Experts indicate that despite Turkey’s support, Sharaa’s selection of Saudi Arabia for his first official visit implies a nuanced diplomatic strategy. Huseyin Bagci, an international relations professor, notes Sharaa’s Arab nationalism and Islamic background, suggesting potential differences with Turkey on regional policies. Turkey, facing economic challenges, may find it difficult to compete with Saudi Arabia’s resources for Syria’s reconstruction.
Sharaa appears to adopt a pragmatic approach, engaging various international players, including Russia. Analysts suggest that while Turkey possesses the capability to aid in rebuilding Syria, the competition for influence in Damascus will intensify as Sharaa seeks broader alliances. Turkey’s military involvement against Kurdish insurgents may also lead to friction with Syria’s new leadership.
Simultaneously, Iran is reportedly shifting its stance towards the new Syrian regime that does not align with Assad’s previous policies. Consequently, an evolving geopolitical landscape emerges, emphasizing Sharaa’s realpolitik stance in navigating these intricate relationships as he aims to rebuild Syria.
The geopolitical landscape in the Middle East, particularly concerning Syria, is characterized by rivalries among regional powers. Turkey and Saudi Arabia have long competed for influence, particularly in the context of the Syrian conflict. As Syria seeks to rebuild following years of war, controlling narratives about governance and reconstruction opportunities has become vital. With Turkish and Saudi interests at stake, the actions of interim President Sharaa will significantly impact these dynamics moving forward.
In conclusion, interim President Sharaa’s diplomatic engagements reflect a balancing act between Turkey and Saudi Arabia, highlighting the complex interplay of regional powers in post-war Syria. While Turkey provides critical support, Sharaa’s preference for Saudi Arabia signifies a calculated approach to garnering influence. The evolving relations between Syria, Turkey, and other key players like Iran will shape not only Syria’s future but also the broader geopolitical landscape in the Middle East.
Original Source: www.rfi.fr
