The Security Council has raised concerns regarding the challenges faced by the Revitalized Peace Agreement in South Sudan, including low political commitment, inter-party distrust, and funding shortages. During discussions, officials noted the extension of the transitional period and rescheduled elections, but caution was advised on the necessity of disarmament and cooperation among armed factions to facilitate credible electoral processes.
The Revitalized Peace Agreement in South Sudan is currently facing considerable obstacles, including insufficient political will, trust issues among involved parties, and inadequate funding. During a recent Security Council meeting, Charles Tai Gituai highlighted the agreed extension of the transitional period until 2027 and the rescheduling of elections to December 2026, despite challenges in election preparations due to financial constraints.
The potential participation of parties with armed forces in the elections remains uncertain unless they disarm, as stipulated by election laws. Gituai emphasized the importance of uniting all armed factions to ensure electoral participation. He also pointed out ongoing intercommunal violence and the adverse effects of the Sudan conflict, which worsens the humanitarian crisis and hampers oil production, the main economic lifeline of South Sudan.
Both Gituai and Nicholas Haysom, the Special Representative of the UN Secretary-General, recognized some progress, particularly in the actions of the National Constitutional Amendment Committee, but noted that current achievements are insufficient to meet essential electoral conditions. Haysom urged all stakeholders to prioritize the benchmarks within the Peace Agreement as the extended transitional period is underway, stressing, “There is no appetite for another extension.”
Concerns about the trajectory towards credible elections were echoed by various Council members who emphasized the importance of security sector reform and the disarmament of armed groups. Pakistan’s representative encouraged South Sudan to utilize the two-year extension effectively. The U.S. delegation criticized the transitional government’s failure to meet the populace’s expectations and called for improved transparency in public spending.
Further speeches highlighted the need for equal involvement of women and youth in peacebuilding efforts through the Mission. China and Russia’s delegates addressed the restrictive impact of sanctions on South Sudan’s security, advocating for adjustments to the current embargoes to better support state-building and stabilization efforts. As the Council continues deliberations, the urgent call for progress towards elections remains a central theme.
The Security Council’s discussions reflect ongoing complications surrounding the implementation of the Revitalized Peace Agreement in South Sudan, established in 2018. The extension of the transitional period and rescheduling of elections highlight the persistent challenges faced by the country’s leaders, including political infighting, lack of trust among parties, and the failure to secure adequate financial resources for crucial electoral preparations. The economic and humanitarian crises exacerbated by conflicts, both internal and external, further complicate the path towards stability and democratic governance.
The ongoing discussions regarding the Revitalized Peace Agreement in South Sudan underscore the critical need for genuine commitment from political leaders, comprehensive reforms, and an inclusive approach to governance. The international community’s role in supporting these efforts remains vital, particularly in facilitating meaningful engagement among stakeholders. As Council members expressed an urgent desire for progress, the situation highlights the delicate balance between maintaining peace and ensuring a robust return to democratic processes within the nation.
Original Source: www.miragenews.com
