South Sudan has blocked social media platforms indefinitely to control unrest-related information. The CPJ criticized this action, calling it excessive censorship detrimental to journalism. Journalists are using VPNs to report but worry about audience access. The ban is part of broader security measures amid ongoing protests. Calls have been made for the immediate lift of this suspension.
Authorities in South Sudan have implemented a blockade on social media platforms in response to increasing unrest, prompting criticism from the Committee to Protect Journalists (CPJ). On January 22, the National Communication Authority instructed all internet service providers to suspend access to social media for a minimum of 30 days.
This directive seeks to diminish the circulation of videos depicting violence against South Sudanese nationals in Sudan, which have incited protests and retaliatory actions. The CPJ condemned this action, asserting that it constitutes excessive censorship, hinders journalistic efforts, and deprives the public of varied news sources.
Journalists within South Sudan are finding ways to manage the situation by utilizing virtual private networks (VPNs) to continue reporting. However, there remains uncertainty regarding whether their audience is able to receive the news published online. Mariak Bol, editor-in-chief of Hot in Juba, expressed concern about audience engagement while employing VPNs for reporting.
The ban coincides with broader security measures, including a curfew enforced in Juba since January 17. The director general of the National Communication Authority, Napoleon Adok Gai, indicated in a press briefing that the ban could be lifted within 72 hours, though official confirmation remains absent. Attempts by CPJ to contact South Sudan’s information minister for further clarification were unsuccessful.
The recent social media blockade in South Sudan is a reaction to public unrest stemming from events in neighboring Sudan. Following the emergence of violent demonstrations linked to the circulation of violent footage, South Sudanese authorities have taken drastic measures to control information dissemination. This raises serious concerns regarding press freedom and public access to reliable information, critical in a stable democratic society.
The shutdown of social media in South Sudan illustrates a significant threat to press freedom and public discourse. As journalists navigate these restrictions through VPNs, the long-term implications for information access and transparency remain dire. The demand for lifting the ban underscores the necessity for open communication channels, especially during turbulent times.
Original Source: punchng.com
