South Sudan has banned social media for up to 90 days in response to unrest fueled by reports of violence in neighboring Sudan. Telecom providers have confirmed the suspension, affecting access to platforms like Facebook and TikTok. Journalists express concern about their ability to communicate with the public without reliable access to these platforms, and government officials have suggested the possibility of lifting the ban soon.
South Sudan has implemented a social media blackout in response to rising unrest within the country. The National Communication Authority instructed all internet service providers to suspend access to social media platforms for a minimum of 30 days, citing concerns that content related to violent protests and killings in neighboring Sudan was inciting further unrest. This suspension comes amid a curfew imposed in Juba on January 17 to manage the situation.
As of January 23, major telecom operators such as Zain South Sudan and MTN South Sudan confirmed the suspension of platforms like Facebook and TikTok. Journalists and human rights defenders reported that access was only possible through virtual private networks (VPNs), which are used to circumvent the restrictions. The editor-in-chief of a local news site expressed uncertainty about whether their audience could receive their reports due to the ban.
The director general of the National Communication Authority, Napoleon Adok Gai, indicated in a press briefing that there is a chance the social media ban could be lifted within 72 hours. However, there has been no official commentary from South Sudan’s information minister, Michael Makuei, regarding the situation. Additionally, inquiries directed to the National Communication Authority remain unanswered.
The current government of South Sudan has faced significant challenges in maintaining order and stability since its independence. Recent events in neighboring Sudan have escalated tensions, leading to protests and violent clashes within South Sudan itself. The government’s actions, including the imposition of a curfew and restrictions on social media, reflect attempts to control the flow of information and quell unrest, although these measures are often criticized by human rights organizations as infringements on free expression.
In summary, South Sudan’s decision to ban social media access is a response to rising civil unrest, particularly influenced by violent incidents in neighboring Sudan. While authorities aim to control the spread of incendiary information, journalists and citizens face significant barriers to communication and access to news. The potential for lifting the ban creates a glimmer of hope for greater media freedom amidst ongoing tensions.
Original Source: news.az
