The National Gallery in London has banned liquids following a series of climate activist attacks on artworks. This move is intended to safeguard the irreplaceable collection and maintain visitor safety amid rising concerns over the frequency and impact of such protests.
In response to a series of recent attacks by climate activists on renowned artworks, the National Gallery in London has instituted a ban on the carrying of liquids within its premises. This policy aims to safeguard the collection, which is deemed irreplaceable, along with the safety of visitors and staff. A statement from the institution elaborates on their reasoning: “The collection we hold is irreplaceable and with each attack we have been forced to consider putting more barriers between the people and their artworks to preserve these fragile objects for future generations. Unfortunately, we have now reached a point where we have been forced to act to protect our visitors, staff and collection.”
The rise in artistic vandalism associated with climate protests has spurred concern within cultural institutions across the globe. Activists, including those from Just Stop Oil, have engaged in dramatic demonstrations, throwing food items at famous artworks to draw attention to urgent issues such as climate change and political turmoil. These actions have led to actual physical damage in some cases, prompting museum officials to reevaluate their security protocols. The National Gallery, having experienced multiple incidents, acknowledges the psychological impact these attacks have on visitors and staff alike, as they feel increasingly unsafe in spaces traditionally perceived as secure and inviting.
The decision by the National Gallery to prohibit liquids is a direct response to the heightened concern for both the preservation of valuable artworks and the safety of all individuals within the premises. As the issue of climate activism intersects with cultural heritage, institutions are placed in a precarious position, advocating for the necessity of protests while simultaneously protecting their collections and the public’s trust.
Original Source: www.washingtonpost.com
